Pragmatics - the relationships between sentences and context or situations - utterance(language use)
1. conversational maxims - When a maxim is violated(flouted) by a speaker who chooses to be uncooperative for whatever reasons, implicatures(a proposition that isn't a part of the utterance, or doesn't follow as a necessary consequence) occurs, and hearers draws an inference from them.
① quantity - more or less informative than required - 필요한 만큼만
ex) A: did you have a good lunch? / B: We had mushroom salad and mushroom sauce on the pasta
② quality - false information(lying) - ex) smoke is helpful for your health - 진실만
③ relation - seemingly unrelated - 관련 / ④ manner - awkward(not perspicuous) way of saying - 올바로
+ generalized and particularized implicature
⑴ generalized implicature - 보편적인 맥락 속에서 생기는 implicature(no special knowledge) - scalar impli
ex) did you invite Suji and IU? - I invited Suji(- I didn't invite IU)
⑵ particularized implicature - 특정한 맥락 속에서만 생기는 implicature(일반적인 상황에선 implicature 유발 x)
ex) what time is it? - some of the guests are already leaving(; it must be late)
+ Q-principle(마치 quiz같다) and R-principle(일반적인 생각) - 참 어렵다.
⑴ Q-principle - make your contribution sufficient - say as much as possible and avoid ambiguity
ex) I'm meeting a man tonight - I'm meeting a man who is not either my husband or boyfriend
ex) Jane ate some of the biscuits - Jane didn't eat all of them(일부를 먹었다는 것은 전체는 먹지 않은 것)
⑵ R-principle - make your contribution necessary - say no more than you need and be concise
ex) I cut a finger yesterday - I cut my finger / ex) He caused his wife to die보단 He killed his wife
2. speech acts - we can do things(make an action) by saying something (language function과의 관계)
+ felicity condition - an utterance가 어떠한 speech act에 적합하기 위한 조건들 / 모든 force는 동시에 일어남
① illocutionary act(force)(conveys a speaker's intention in an uttered sentence) + perlocutionary(청자행동)
⑴ explicit vs non explicit - performative verb
- performative sense - positive, present, 1st person agent, specific event
- performative criteria - voluntary act, performed with words(hereby - 이로 인해)
ex) stand up! - I command you to stand up / ?I explain why I did it - I will explain why I did it
⑵ direct vs indirect (non-explicit) - match illocutionary act(primary) with syntactic form(secondary)
- statement(assertive, commissive, declarative) / declarative(평서문) - ex) I bet you this it will rain
- directive(order, request) / imperative - ex) be quiet / isn't it too cold?(목적은 order / implicature 발생)
- question / interrogative - ex) do you know Mary? / can you pass me the salt(목적은 request / “ )
- expressive / exclamatory - ex) how nice you are!
② locutionary act - 의미 전달만(convey meaning by the production of a meaningful linguistic expression)
⑶ expressed vs implied (maxim of relation)
ex) do you have the time? - do you have a watch? - time에 관한 이야기니깐 이게 명시적으로 포함되어야 함
⑷ literal vs non-literal (maxim of manner, absurd, impossible)
ex) please turn down the radio - I think it would kill you to turn down the radio
+ sarcasm is one of the non-literal locutionary speech act
do not smoke | direct | expressed | literal |
please don't smoke | o | o | o |
by all means go right a head and smoke | o | x | x |
think about what you're doing to your lung | o | x | o |
would you please not smoke? | x | o | o |
go ahead and kill yourself, see I care | o | x | x |
I guess it would kill you to stop smoking | x | o | x |
cigarette smoking is dangerous to your health | x | x | o |
smoking is glamorous | x | x | x |
+ situation dialects - styles or registers(formal, informal)
'고등 내용정리 > 영어내용정리' 카테고리의 다른 글
쉽게 풀어 쓴 영어 문장 학습 1장(기본 용어 정리) (0) | 2023.01.02 |
---|---|
Morphology(형태론) (0) | 2022.11.18 |
Semantics(의미론)(2) (0) | 2022.11.16 |
Semantics(의미론)(1) (0) | 2022.11.16 |
Phonetics(음성학) & Phonology(음운론) - Prosodic features(supra-segmental)(2) (0) | 2022.11.15 |
댓글